1 / 11
Roche Diagnostics · Warehouse Modernization

mSCORE

Replacing legacy warehouse software with SAP EWM at the Mannheim hub
IT Project Lead: Jens Becker Status: CW27 / July 2026 Go-Live Target: Feb 2028
Why SCORE?
Supply Chain Operations Run EWM
The new ASPIRE timeline opens a strategic window to modernize legacy warehouse management systems — before the main transformation wave.

Strategic Window

ASPIRE replanning creates a unique opportunity to replace end-of-life WMS systems ahead of the main deployment wave.

Legacy Risk

Outdated systems (LogSys, Exacta, x47) require replacement to protect operations at Mannheim, Indianapolis, and Monsheim.

🎯

One Platform

Align global hubs on a single SAP EWM (x84) platform — realizing the DSC strategic goal "Next Gen IT and Processes".

Retain PLS Material Flow System.
Replace the rest with EWM x84 in one step.
Today
ERP – P1U
LogSys ABS
Warehouse Management System
LogSys PLA
Task Planning System
LogSys PLS
Material Flow Control
PLC
PLC
PLC
PLC
Tomorrow
ERP – P1U
Distribution Center
EWM X84
Warehouse Management System
LogSys PLS
Material Flow Control
PLC
PLC
PLC
PLC
What changes
Replace the WMS and Planning Layer of LogSys with EWM x84. Connect x84 to the Material Flow Control System. Keep Hardware and PLCs unchanged.
One-step cutover
PLS retained
Hardware unchanged
SAP data compatibility
Three Projects, One Platform
SCORE delivers three dedicated sub-projects on a shared SAP EWM x84 instance, governed by the Warehouse ART.

iSCORE · Indianapolis

Transition from Exacta into EWM x84. Phased replacement starting with inbound, delivery management, batching, and cubing.

Go-Live: Jul 2027

mSCORE · Mannheim

Replace LogSys WMS and Planning Layer with EWM x84. Retain PLS Material Flow System. One-step cutover for ~300 users.

Go-Live: Feb 2028 ← You are here

tSCORE · Monsheim (DCI)

Lift-and-shift migration from EWM x47 to x84. Blueprint for reusable instrument warehouse solution.

Go-Live: Jan 2028
How We're Set Up
Additional Governance
Bodies
ASPIRE Sponsor Board
Business strategy alignment, Budget decision, updates
Steering Committee
Implementation decisions
SCORE Program Mgmt
iSCORE
User Lead: Tim York
IT Lead: Paul Yonnotti (Accenture)
mSCORE
User Lead: Alfonso Terrazzino
IT Lead: Jens Becker
tSCORE
User Lead: Marius Koessler
IT Lead: Cedric Weber
Warehouse ART
Solution Delivery & Template Enhancement (SAP EWM X84)
Process Teams
All team members across process areas and cross-functional roles.
PO
Product Owner — owns the backlog and priorities
TO
Technical Owner — owns solution design and architecture
BA
Business Analyst — requirements, process analysis, testing
PCR
Project Change Requestor — mSCORE representative in the Warehouse ART
Storage
PO
Jan Groschopp
TO
Karim Abbas
(Jan Maether)
PCR
Christopher Meffert
PCR
Marcus Ball
BA
Akif Koctepe
Outbound
PO
Stefanie Arb
TO
Aron Wiesner
PCR
Marcus Ball
PCR
David Hess
BA
Hendrik Lütjen
Inbound (external)
PO
Sandra Gandenberger
PCR
Christopher Meffert
PCR
Marcus Ball
BA
Mathias Dreher
Production Support
PO
Ernestine Dickhaut
PCR
Christopher Meffert
BA
Thomas Kenn
BA
Akif Koctepe
Reporting & Monitoring
PO
Felix Sterzel
PO
Carlos Gonzalez-Rojas
PCR
David Hess
BA
David Hoffmann
PLS
PO
Hussein Atris
PO
Wolfgang Schindeldecker
PCR
Christopher Meffert
PCR
Marcus Ball
PCR
David Hess
BA
Hendrik Lütjen
Cross-Functional
PMO
Kristina Krnjaic
Communication
Lara Röderer
Training
Isabell Koh
OCM (incl. ASPIRE)
Stefanie Arb
Project Support
Jana Leibold
Accenture
Merve Erdem
Accenture
mSCORE Timeline
Design, Build, Test phase running from Jan 2026 through Apr 2027, followed by OAT and go-live preparation.
Initiate Sep–Dec 2025
WE ARE HERE
Design, Build, Test Jan 2026 – Apr 2027
OAT Prep May – Jul 2027
OAT / Transition Aug – Nov 2027
Deploy Dec 27 – Feb 28
Q4 2025 Q1 2026 Q2 2026 Q3 2026 Q4 2026 Q1 2027 Q2 2027 Q3 2027 Q4 2027 Q1 2028
0
PI Cycles
PI 6 – PI 13
0
Process Teams
Storage, Outbound, Inbound, ProdSupport, Monitoring, PLS
~0
Warehouse Users
Mannheim Distribution Center
ASPIRE
Funding
Early Value Deployment funded by ASPIRE
Warehouse Platform Roadmap
2026
2027
2028
2029
iSCORE · Indianapolis
Design, Build & Test → OAT → HC
tSCORE · Monsheim
Design, Build & Test → HC
mSCORE · Mannheim
Design, Build & Test → OAT → HC (Feb 28)
WTLOM NMHM
HC
Platform Readiness (x84/x1S)
USI · US3 · CA1
3 US/CA deployments
DEC · DED · DEF · DEG
4 DE site rollouts
DE1 · UK3 · ES1
3 EU deployments
Shared ART, shared platform — mSCORE competes for capacity with up to 15 parallel deployments
Peak: 2028
15+ projects
Project Health Dashboard
0
Active Stories
↓ 13 vs CW26
0.4%
Handover Rate
→ stable
0
Unplanned Stories
↓ 14 vs CW26
0.5%
Sizing Coverage
↑ 1pp vs CW26
Story Burndown
Active stories remaining vs. ideal burn toward go-live (Feb 2028)
0 150 300 450 600 Q1 26 Q2 26 Q3 26 Q4 26 Q1 27 Q2 27 Q3 27 Q4 27 537 524 CW27 · NOW GO-LIVE
Actual Ideal Burn Go-Live Feb 2028
Story Pipeline
Current distribution of 524 active stories across the delivery pipeline.
0
Funnel
0
Draft
0
Ready
0
Handover+
0
In Progress / Testing
0
Done
118
Storage
10 handover+
206
Outbound
3 handover+
47
Inbound
2 handover+
30
Prod Support
0 handover+
104
Monitoring
0 handover+
23
PLS
2 handover+
Key Focus Areas

📈 Increase Handover Rate

Accelerate story refinement and handover across all 6 process teams. Target: move from 3.4% to 15%+ by end of PI 8.

📋 Reduce Unplanned Backlog

113 stories without PI labels need assignment. Systematic cleanup sprint-by-sprint to improve planning accuracy.

⚡ Crunch Time Preparation

Preparing for the critical delivery phase in PI 8 and beyond. Ramping up team capacity, aligning dependencies, and ensuring readiness for accelerated build & test cycles.

mSCORE · Roche Diagnostics · For internal use only · July 2026
Doing now what patients need next